Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

Views:      
 
 
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 14, 2012 2:12 pm

Oh and an addendum to my post- mano raises a point i completely forgot. Nothing eternal can be eternally blissful, human nature one of adapting, given enough time we will become bored. If you read any old school myths and such, or stories centered around eternal entities, a running theme is their jealousy of mortal life.

Now immortality has its benefits i guess, i cant begin to fathom the pain i would feel to lose those i love, as can be seen in my recent posts, the premise of love and relationships of a non-platonic nature have been on my mind a lot lately and i quiver to picture a world without this other person, and it gets you thinking, if it all works then how will i feel the die she passes away, when we are both old and i can say honestly, that it sickens me to think about it, but as much as i would never want to feel that pain, how would i feel after a million years? not to say love will disapate but at what point is peace the better option for you both. I like the idea of a finite life, the idea that any moment can be your last and it makes you really chase and hold on to the things you want in life, the things you are sure of and if you get them, if i get to feel true happiness then i will cherish it and not let it go, i would wake up each day and feel bliss knowing that i get to gaze upon an angel every morning, to be in awe of her beauty, her eyes and her heart, i will enjoy every moment because at the end of the day- time is the most precious thing we have, if you wait too long you will look back and regret the times you could of had next to this person, you lose memories...memories the most underappreciated facet of our existence. in an eternal life you dont have that, why do today what you could do in a thousand years? whats the worry? the hurry? there is no sense of urgency or excitement...

ramblings of someone who is clearly emotionally comprimised.

2k
Ravens2k
SinceDec 25, 2008
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 14, 2012 2:26 pm

ramblings of someone who is clearly emotionally comprimised.
Do I have to relieve you of your duty, Captain?

Obviously, 2k has gone all mushy on me...time to find a new sidekick!

Hey #3....you in?? WinkCool
MANOSTEEL9423
SinceSep 7, 2006
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 14, 2012 2:31 pm

HA! great reference.

oh im fine but in all seriousness, such things really do put things in perspective, you know, life, meaning, god, afterlife, its all been on my mind in a new way- its fascinating to be honest.

perspective is a wonderful thing.

Also, I'm sherlock damn it! get that  mr.watson!

2k
Ravens2k
SinceDec 25, 2008
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 14, 2012 3:04 pm

oh im fine but in all seriousness, such things really do put things in perspective, you know, life, meaning, god, afterlife, its all been on my mind in a new way- its fascinating to be honest.
It really is, I get it.  I'm 37 years old now and I remember distinctly thinking, at the age of 18, that I'd be surprised if I made it past my 36th birthday.  Not that I was an out of control teen or anything, I just had a lot of ambitions that included dangerous activities, like skydiving, cliff diving, etc.  I've always wanted to experience those things and challenge my fears, even from a young age.

Once I became a father, at the tender age of 23, that all changed immediately.  While I am still interested in those things, my fear of them is greatly increased.  I don't fear for my own mortality as much as I fear for what it would do to my family.

Just wait, 2k...the love you feel for this new person in your life is an amazing thing, but it will be dwarfed by the love you feel for your children should you be so lucky.
Also, I'm sherlock damn it! get that  mr.watson!
Indubitably! Wink
MANOSTEEL9423
SinceSep 7, 2006
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 14, 2012 4:16 pm

They say he's in charge of every decision we make yet say we have free will.  They'll tell me God loves me unconditionally but then tell me he'll send me to hell if I don't believe.  They'll tell me God controls everything in our lives and that every good thing that happens is his doing, but then give him none of the credit for the bad things that happen.  They say He's omniscient but yet even thought he supposedly knew that I wouldn't be a believer LONG before I was even born, he's going to hold it against me anyway.  He created me, He chose my path, then He faults me for--RavensR#1

This, among other things, is precisely what I was referring to on the previous page about the hypocrisies of organized religion -- specifically, Christianity.  It is for these reasons that I am a man of faith and a spiritual person, but not a religious one.  I was re-baptized in 2010 only to abandon that same church within the year for engaging in everything that made me depart from organized religion in the first place.  It was interfering with my ability to practice my faith in a way that made sense so I made the decision to explore a relationship with God and Christ that was completely independent of the church.  I'm not alone in this as there are groups out there who do the same: who believe in God, who accept Christ as their Lord and Savior, and who continue to read and study the Bible (as well as the Torah) for the purpose of extrapolating meaning from scripture rather than viewing it as a literal account of past events.  

Everything that you stated there are things that I've debated and even argued about with a side of my family that has been deeply entrenched in the ministries and theology for generations.  What makes interacting with extremely devout and hardcore religious fanatics so intolerable in addition to their hypocrisies and contradictions is just how stubbornly closed-minded they are to the logical and philosophical questions that need to be answered in order for organized religion to reedeem a shred of credibility coupled with how utterly ignorant they are to the preponderance of factual scientific data which disproves many of their silly creationist theories. 

One thing that ties directly into what you're saying is in challenging the very basic conventions of Christianity with the affirmation that all Jews and other people of faith who believe in [a] God or who live an upright and righteous life are condemned to an eternity in hell, regardless of their actions on earth, because they don't believe that Jesus Christ was their messiah and/or Savior.  I take serious issue with the notion that someone who lives a life of crime (including something as hideous as being a lifelong pedophile) can accept Christ as their Savior on their death bed and be ushered straight through the pearly gates while someone who may have patterned their life after Ghandi but "failed" to accept Christ get's a one-way ticket into an eternal inferno.  What about everyone who died before the time of Christ?  Everyone from Abraham to Moses to Job and all the kings of Jerusalem allegedly went to heaven yet none of them are Christians who accepted Christ as their savior so did they get evicted from Paradise and tossed into the fire upon his death?

There are a plethora of extremely valid questions that depreciate the viability of religious doctrine as the creeds of virtue and altruism that it purports to be.  God's ways are higher than ours so it is the height of human ignorance and arrogance to attempt to define them.  Likewise, until religion can be used in conjunction with science instead of attempting to discredit it with Biblical interpretations then it is doing itself, as well as mankind, a disservice.                           
SteelerKing
SinceSep 11, 2008
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 14, 2012 4:26 pm

Just wait, 2k...the love you feel for this new person in your life is an amazing thing, but it will be dwarfed by the love you feel for your children should you be so lucky.


ill have to take your word for it, as it stands right now, i dont get how i can feel 'more' you know? its hard to put in to words.

Something else that has been on my mind, i wont go in to specifics but lets say, i was recently faced with someone incredibly dear to someone i know and care for passing away and i was confronted with true loss. Now i have faced it myself but never before have i felt so helpless and without answer to soothe this person i cared for...i was stuck in my own mind between the rational side of me saying...well death is it, it finishes after it but thats abrupt and harsh and while i dont believe in an after life i have given it a lot of thought, its hard to listen to those you care for cry and you cant help but feel helpless.

I make this post as somewhat of an addition to my previous posts, memories. teachings, morales etc, they all carry, in my mind, tangible wieght in reality. and to live forever, in my mind is to live through others by way of imparting your own wisdom, or so thats what i said to this person, in her you see a lot of the person she loevd and lost and my point to those that say immortality is the be all end of all our existence in some way i would say, we already have it. to honor the memory of those that have gone by, to honor- in this specific case, their strength, independance and heart is to pay homeage to their life and to further the reach of their love and wisdom and by that measure to achieve immortality.

the fear of the unkown and death is something that is becoming more and more familiar with me, but i dont think its something to run from, i think we should embrace our mortal finite existence and when we feel loss, we should rightfully mourn but also celebrate their life, dont let their memory fade in to nothing...

more ramblings i guess, but this thread has been on my mind a lot.

2k

Ravens2k
SinceDec 25, 2008
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 14, 2012 4:30 pm

SK (im just going to call you that cos i cant be bothered to right out your full name every time) i will address your latest post if i get more time tonight, but it raises a lot of very interesting points. one that really makes me think is your premise that you can follow the teachings of an organised religion or at least its key icons if you will, yet not associate yourself with any particular sect, what gives you that liberty? does that make you christian? how would god see such a stance? i will elaborate later but that was an intriguing read.

i will post again when i find my testicles.

2k
Ravens2k
SinceDec 25, 2008
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 14, 2012 4:38 pm

Something else that has been on my mind, i wont go in to specifics but lets say, i was recently faced with someone incredibly dear to someone i know and care for passing away and i was confronted with true loss. Now i have faced it myself but never before have i felt so helpless and without answer to soothe this person i cared for...i was stuck in my own mind between the rational side of me saying...well death is it, it finishes after it but thats abrupt and harsh and while i dont believe in an after life i have given it a lot of thought, its hard to listen to those you care for cry and you cant help but feel helpless.
Its a conundrum, 2k, no doubt.  I've had similar experiences when I've lost family members.  I've never been able to say, "Well, they've gone to a better place..." line because I just don't believe it.  Like you, I try to focus on their lives and remembering them for who they are.


MANOSTEEL9423
SinceSep 7, 2006
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 14, 2012 4:47 pm

Thanks again.  I wish every faithful man could be so rational.  Unfortunately, faith doesn't always promote rationality.--Mano

And I wish that every non-believer could be as respectful of the beliefs of the faithful.  

Religion, especially at the orthodox level, serves only to stifle that development and that, quite honestly, pisses me off!

Agreed.  It's a topic that I'm very passionate about and you can read what I had to say in my post to RavensR#1 as it's directed to you as well.  This is what I was referring to in the post that you quoted as it echoes my own sentiments from the bottom paragraph: "The Bible is a collection of stories and teachings that can serve as a template, particularly within the New Testament, on how to live a fulfilling life and treat one another but it should not be regarded as a verbatim account of fact and reality.  Those who choose to interpret the Bible in it's most literal form are often the most dangerous and counterproductive of all Christians and other people of faith because they will invariably engage in the myopic behaviors and thought processes which stagnate humanity's progress towards understanding the very things that you all are discussing in this thread."

I have more to say on God, Christ, and faith but wanted to clarify my stance on religion before I do so. 
SteelerKing
SinceSep 11, 2008
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 14, 2012 4:54 pm

one that really makes me think is your premise that you can follow the teachings of an organised religion or at least its key icons if you will, yet not associate yourself with any particular sect, what gives you that liberty? does that make you christian? how would god see such a stance?
Its like any other sect of that religion, 2k.  The reason there are hundreds of Christian sects is because none of them can agree on what the true focus should be within the doctrine.  They all have their own idiosyncrosies.  I think its pretty plain in the scriptures that accepting Jesus as the saviour is what is required.  Adhering to any specific sect of Christianity is not really an issue, although the adherents of those sects might tell you otherwise.

Technically, if King is not adhering to any specific religious sect, he has started his own! Boy, could I come up with some GREAT names for that religion!!! Laughing
MANOSTEEL9423
SinceSep 7, 2006
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 14, 2012 5:14 pm

Agreed.  It's a topic that I'm very passionate about and you can read what I had to say in my post to RavensR#1 as it's directed to you as well.  This is what I was referring to in the post that you quoted as it echoes my own sentiments from the bottom paragraph: "The Bible is a collection of stories and teachings that can serve as a template, particularly within the New Testament, on how to live a fulfilling life and treat one another but it should not be regarded as a verbatim account of fact and reality.  Those who choose to interpret the Bible in it's most literal form are often the most dangerous and counterproductive of all Christians and other people of faith because they will invariably engage in the myopic behaviors and thought processes which stagnate humanity's progress towards understanding the very things that you all are discussing in this thread."


and more interesting points are raised. i need to find my balls and write an essay damn it! must resist responding.

also mano, i kind of got that much but it was more so pointing towards the question of ' at what point have you deviated to far from the original message? what is the central message? who decides if what you are doing is right? basically its far to obscure in my mind, and this is somehting i think SK and yourself mano and i agree on. its hard to justify.

More on that later.

2k
2k
Ravens2k
SinceDec 25, 2008
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 14, 2012 5:42 pm

one that really makes me think is your premise that you can follow the teachings of an organised religion or at least its key icons if you will, yet not associate yourself with any particular sect, what gives you that liberty? does that make you christian? how would god see such a stance?

I am a Christian by virtue of accepting Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior.  However, I take issue with many of the same things that you and Mano do in regards to organized religion and religious doctrine.  Remember that Christ did not found Christianity and would most likely be ashamed of what it turned into.  One of my oldest customers recently approached me about a group she participates in that is similarly turned off by organized religion and recognizes that it bastardizes and misuses the Bible.  I'll send her an email this evening and get the name of it but just know that it is part of a non-denominational branch of Christianity.  What gives me the liberty to not identify with most mainstream Christian sects is the same thing that gave rise to non-denominational churches in the first place as well as what gives you the liberty to not believe in God or Christ: free will.  This is one of the most integral but also controversial aspects of faith or religion alike because while some of the best known Christians in history (including St. Augustine, Martin Luther, and John Calvin) have taught us that there is no free will, God nevertheless created free will when he created Adam and Eve.  Eve chose to eat the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden, as did Adam, and this is the first example of God's creation of free will all the way back in the Book of Genesis.  

Quoted from a Christian website: "To have nonfreethinking and nonfreedoing "robots" precisely duplicating yourself is vain and boring: but to have creatures with their own minds and wills to be able to make their own choices, and then when they freely choose good and right and obedience, that brings great pleasure for the Creator."
I believe that answers your last question as well.  Smile   
SteelerKing
SinceSep 11, 2008
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 14, 2012 5:53 pm

DAMN IT STOP! i wish i could put this thread on hold and have the ability to not checkit. btw, it does not answer my question outright but more on that later. ill get to your reply later, i think this discussion will be very interesting as we (mano and I) have not encountered such a stance in this thread thus far...should be interesting.

2k
Ravens2k
SinceDec 25, 2008
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 14, 2012 6:41 pm

This, among other things, is precisely what I was referring to on the previous page about the hypocrisies of organized religion -- specifically, Christianity.  It is for these reasons that I am a man of faith and a spiritual person, but not a religious one.  I was re-baptized in 2010 only to abandon that same church within the year for engaging in everything that made me depart from organized religion in the first place.  It was interfering with my ability to practice my faith in a way that made sense so I made the decision to explore a relationship with God and Christ that was completely independent of the church.  I'm not alone in this as there are groups out there who do the same: who believe in God, who accept Christ as their Lord and Savior, and who continue to read and study the Bible (as well as the Torah) for the purpose of extrapolating meaning from scripture rather than viewing it as a literal account of past events.  

Everything that you stated there are things that I've debated and even argued about with a side of my family that has been deeply entrenched in the ministries and theology for generations.  What makes interacting with extremely devout and hardcore religious fanatics so intolerable in addition to their hypocrisies and contradictions is just how stubbornly closed-minded they are to the logical and philosophical questions that need to be answered in order for organized religion to reedeem a shred of credibility coupled with how utterly ignorant they are to the preponderance of factual scientific data which disproves many of their silly creationist theories. 

One thing that ties directly into what you're saying is in challenging the very basic conventions of Christianity with the affirmation that all Jews and other people of faith who believe in [a] God or who live an upright and righteous life are condemned to an eternity in hell, regardless of their actions on earth, because they don't believe that Jesus Christ was their messiah and/or Savior.  I take serious issue with the notion that someone who lives a life of crime (including something as hideous as being a lifelong pedophile) can accept Christ as their Savior on their death bed and be ushered straight through the pearly gates while someone who may have patterned their life after Ghandi but "failed" to accept Christ get's a one-way ticket into an eternal inferno.  What about everyone who died before the time of Christ?  Everyone from Abraham to Moses to Job and all the kings of Jerusalem allegedly went to heaven yet none of them are Christians who accepted Christ as their savior so did they get evicted from Paradise and tossed into the fire upon his death?

There are a plethora of extremely valid questions that depreciate the viability of religious doctrine as the creeds of virtue and altruism that it purports to be.  God's ways are higher than ours so it is the height of human ignorance and arrogance to attempt to define them.  Likewise, until religion can be used in conjunction with science instead of attempting to discredit it with Biblical interpretations then it is doing itself, as well as mankind, a disservice.
I never like to quote an entire post but this is exactly the type of answer I've always wanted from the believers that I've discussed religion with.  Many people feel that you can't believe and question at the same time.  Personally, my faith was shaken a decade ago and I haven't had anything able to restore it since, but I've never called out anyone for their beliefs or even tried to change their beliefs.  It just has always boggled my mind that people don't see the contradictions.

King, I like you're approach.  Many don't question the values instilled upon them from the moment they are born and even more can't fathom how someone who thinks differently has the potential to be correct or at least not be wrong.

ravens_R_#1
SinceDec 21, 2006
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 14, 2012 7:34 pm

oh fuck**** it. basically i think the next step here, is to figure out why your belief is your belief, as rediculous as that sounds. Im very interested to see why you decide to follow jesus and not buddha, or any of the other people in mythology that jesus seems to have been moulded after. furthermore, why stop where you stop, you clearly see a lot of the contradictions that are inherent in such a world view yet stop short of affirming what mano and i do. its almost as though you are sitting on a fence but both of your legs are firmly on one side, all you need is a nudge :p

now i have a feeling of what your response may be to such a line of questioning but lets see what you say. i do think rational thought is not applicable nor can it exist in the world of popular religion- spirituality sure, but to attach yourself to any doctrine of belief such as the abrahamic belief systems just does not jive with the rational mind.

back i go to this bs essay.

2k

Ravens2k
SinceDec 25, 2008
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 15, 2012 2:00 pm

your love for this idea if you will, is baseless as you cant even verify that such a man existed.

Not that it matters, but ..There are those who disagree ... and can historically support their findings.

link  link



MoS
MaineofSteel
SinceAug 17, 2008
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 15, 2012 2:04 pm

yeh thats evidence, poor evidence, i refer you to manos post on the subject, that will hopefully elucidate whether or not jesus has actually been verified to exist.

2k
Ravens2k
SinceDec 25, 2008
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 15, 2012 2:23 pm

Again i got no real discourse with MoS on the issue of god not being omnipotent, which is kind of a new take on the whole god thing for me

MoS said:

I find it very similar to the God is omniscient arguement.  As I said before, He is not.  There are definately things He cannot do, so, by strict definition omniscience is out.

just to keep the kitchen clean, I was talking omniscience, not omnipotence.  Although both are closely related, omnipotence allows for the Diety's personal reflections to weigh in on the mix. (will not lie, steal etc ... by It's very nature) Omniscience is the Diety's ability to do anything it wants because it can, but is uncontrolled in the dispensation of that power . 



MoS



MaineofSteel
SinceAug 17, 2008
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 15, 2012 2:26 pm

Not that it matters, but ..There are those who disagree ... and can historically support their findings.

link  link
Oh goodness...I really didn't want to get into this, but since 2k dragged me into it, here goes.  For the record, AGAIN, I believe that a man named Jesus actually existed, however, you asked for it.

LINK

This essay will explain pretty thoroughly why the sources used in your two links are not particularly valid as any kind of "proof" of his existence.  Not one of the historical figures who mention the name of Jesus, whether it was Josephus, Pliny the Elder, Tacitus or any other you might find, had even been born before Jesus reportedly died.  This means that not one of them ever actually witnessed this man themselves but is only going off of hearsay evidence of his existence.

Are they closer to the source?  Absolutely, but they weren't there.


MANOSTEEL9423
SinceSep 7, 2006
-

Discussion on the FSM- keep it clean/respectful

May 15, 2012 2:53 pm

not one of them ever actually witnessed this man themselves but is only going off of hearsay evidence of his existence.

Who speaks off of hearsay evidence about someone who never existed ?  Why would they be having the converstaion at all if the events never happened ? There would be nothing to discuss, as it never happened to have a discussion about .. yes ? If you, personally, are not at a specific event to eyewitness it, does that mean it did not happen ? 

Of course not, it just means you do not trust the source...  a continuing problem between the believer and non.  I understand completely your unwillingess to accept information unconfirmed by first person accounts.  I do not understand how first person accounts can be the only evidence one would accept. 
MoS
MaineofSteel
SinceAug 17, 2008